The Time story about the Voter Protection Program seems to want to paint them as the heroes of the 2020 election and the saviors of Democracy, which was of course in eminent danger.
I'm sure they all are patting themselves on the back too. I doubt that they made as much difference as they like to think that they did. That's just a gut feeling. Usually, if mainstream media starts saying "These people are important", I doubt their importance. It's sort of like my grandma saying "This is where the cool kids hang out". You definitely don't know that Grandma, now let's get you your pills. So who influenced the election more?
Are the Democrats going to call the midterm elections
rigged against them if they don't win?
Klaus Schwab opens World Economic Forum's virtual "Davos Agenda" and introduces China's Xi Jinping.
Why is the narrative seeming to change?
Pfizer Trials: All Injected Mothers Lost Their Unborn Babies
Pfizer trial documents reveal attempts to cover up the death of 100% of unborn babies in outcomes actually reported
By Dr. Mark Trozzi
Look at table 6 from this Pfizer report. It is titled “Missing Information”. “Missing Information” has “Use in pregnancy and lactation”. It includes this paragraph:
“Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth w/ neonatal death, spontaneous abortion w/ intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each).
No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).”
What we do know is that of 27 reported pregnancies (270 subtract 243), there are 28 dead babies!
100% of the unborn babies died.
Be as generous as you can. What is the actual thinking behind something like this?